Analysis of
the specified results
The results I have appear to be commonplace, but
there is a contradictory answer with the first question.
Students are happy to pay nothing for a monthly
or termly distributed magazine from the reception or coffee shop with red,
white and black colours that are eye-catching, especially if it contains
updates for revision, competitions, music, fashion and food, and they are happy
to get the magazine if it contains free stuff, since freebies are just awesome.
They are happy to see themselves and others with their work on the front cover,
and they also want it to be multi-platform so they can share the magazine with
friends on Facebook. They will even permit for relevant advertising in the
magazine.
Yet 90% of all students do not, or would
probably not, read the magazine anyway. So what is the use of distributing a
student’s college magazine if so few people are interested in reading it? They
expect so much from it, but when it comes around they were never interested in
the first place. By using these results, it is possible that the magazine could
be revamped into a whole new thing, enforcing ideas provided by the students,
for the students. This gives the magazine a new lease of life and an
opportunity to rescue its positive reputation among the students.
It is possible to put effort into this
magazine to revive it, and with (mostly) approximate results relating to what
the students want, its revamp and return could be a success.
