I'm awfully sorry Nicholas and Ellie. I tried as best as I could but the work is probably not up to scratch; that's what happens when I don't work at a reasonable pace before. I did what I could so hopefully the work provided will be of use.
Monday, 9 May 2016
Evaluation Question 4
Evaluation Question 5 - Evaluation of p.i
PLEASE NOTE...
Changes have been made to the products in order to meet specific criteria. The products shown in both the original and montage videos of the interview are those of the previous versions.
The original evaluation is here, starring Joseph Jordan as the interviewee:
The awfully edited montage version which I pretty much wasted my time making is here, mainly for the purpose of uploading an educational video with more 'taste' than what other students do (it's an awful video though):
These are the questions I asked:
- What aspects of the front cover appeal to you and grab your attention, and what else stands out?
- What aspects appear unsatisfactory or ‘just short of the mark’ in your opinion, and what would you like to see improved?
- Can you identify the genre of the magazine at a first glance?
- Does the colour scheme work for the genre, and if not, why?
- What do you think of the use of the images?
- What is your view on the text such as the cover lines and the DPS article, as well as their presentation in terms of the language used?
- What do you think is the magazine’s Unique Selling Point?
- Personally, would you buy the magazine, and why or why not?
- Is there anything else you would like to mention?
Final Product: p.i
UPDATE (09/05/2016)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


